| In June 1990 a horrifying campaign of harassment was initiated in London by
| what are believed to be elements of the security services. The harassment has
| continued for over five years, starting from the broadcast and print media,
| and encompassing abuse through set-up situations and by people in public
| places. It has been brought to the attention of the police and they are aware
| what is happening, but are not taking any action to prevent it.
corley, you puzzle me!
i've narrowed your possible motives down to one or more of the following:
1) you work on behalf of the british government with a hidden agenda of
furthering the largely right wing (most to hide) censorship brigade's
cause, "a drug-crazed psycho posting dangerous nonsense - how very very
sad - but in the public interest,we must act." draft internet (censorship)
bills rolling off hm govt's banders at this very moment, I don't doubt it!
2) you work for the daily mail which has started to feel the "internet
pinch" as it suddenly clicks in the chronically adled minds of yet more and
more of their readers - that shudder-inducing realisation that the entire
editorial staff at the mail are scaremongering, imbecilic, blood-leeching ,
totalitarian twats - can any else sense a coordinated campaign on its way
??- "Mail urges (their) government to act - internet safety endangered by
uncontrolled surfing lunatics - boys hands blown off by internet maniacs -
net porn responsible for 392323rd rape " .net porn responsible for
392324th rape " .net porn responsible for 392325th rape " .net porn
responsible for 392326th rape " .net porn responsible for 392327th rape "
net porn responsible for 392328th rape " .net porn responsible for
392329th rape " .net porn responsible for 392330th rape " .net porn
responsible for 392331st rape " .net porn responsible for 392332nd rape "
net porn responsible for 392333rd rape " .net porn responsible for
392334th rape " .net porn responsible for 392335th rape " .net porn
responsible for 392336th rape " .net porn responsible for 392337th rape "
net porn responsible for 392338th rape " etcetera, straight from the old
nag's mouth..
lee-potter (and english), take particular note.. (how ever you two common
********* managed to avoid encarceration for what was, quite
evidently,wilful contempt of court in the regina v taylforth & knights
case, is frankly beyond me.. those dreaded and now all too familiar words
"endemic corruption" were muttered by at least one Q.C.
>3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you
>have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the
>heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even
>capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.)
4) you (as an email address) are serving as some bizarre "educational"
programme orchestrated by the psychiatric industry - ever keen to justify
enforced electrical lobotomies, electroshock and dwugs .All poised for the
echo? - "corley frigging well needs lobotomising"
5) you're just clinically insane with absolutely no comprehension or
insight into the consequences you will possibly face as a result of
repeatedly posting what, certainly on the face of it, looks like complete
and utter bullshit.
6) you're some weirdo prankster(s) - probably a group of student
psychiatrists having a cheap crack whilst high as kites on pilfered
dihydrocodeine.
7) You are infact working for the ss yourself, gauging public awareness of
the extent and methods of bugging - infinity transmitters, microwave
surveillance devices, satellite tracking equipment, 'chipping' of black
crims, say no more.
8) You're fuelling the central usenet administration committee, who, it is
believed, are keen to see the introduction of a wide-reaching framework of
self-created powers relating to posting cancellation. (see the 'son of
RFC1036')
my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks
instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing
experiments in montreal.. would be a good starting point ... or perhaps
"professor" watts and his widely admired masterful double eye-jabbing trick
- a couple of wallops with an icepick. such a waste of perfectly edible
four year old hispanics !!!!.. Perhaps the old marylebone rd posse could
fill us in with a few more facts on this one...?? You are all on the .net
now ????? A very warm welcome :-) ... christmas rapidly approaching..
>business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!!
Actually, upon thinking about Mike's story it reminds me of someone I
heard about who suffered from a persecution copmlex. He was an immigrant
from some Eastern Bloc country who believed that 30 years after he
emigrated the KGB were still after him. He would blame them if he
had difficulty unlocking his car for instance (he reckoned they were
putting something into the locks!).
Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell,
loonies make life more fun! From: "Ja" <ja[]news.tpi.pl> Subject: Re: tez tak macie? Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 17:45:45 +0200
Użytkownik "Leon " napisał w wiadomości
news:d67lu3$b4g$1@inews.gazeta.pl...
>> Po tygodniu podałem wniosek na Radzie o usunięcie ze szkoły.
>> Przegłosowano na tak, (drugi raz).
>> Raz mi już dyro zawiesił uchwałę, bo niepełnoletni, teraz mu stuknęlo 18.
>
> batmanek ma dopiero 13 lat :) jednakże usunięcie to s-f. po prostu musi do nas
> chodzic :) w zasadzie trzebaby go zostawić, bo są ku temu powody, ale mamy
> go juz wszyscy dosyc :)
Nigdy nie slyszales o pogotowiu opiekunczym?
Zapewniem Cie, ze sedziowie znaja to pojecie...
"na dziś" możecie mu dać ocenę naganną z zachowania
oraz stosowną opinię. From: "halley" <halley[]op.pl> Subject: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Re:_Niemiecki=5Fkorepetycje=5FBrwin=F3w?= Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:01:41 +0100
> Kontakt: Edyta: 0 507 480 310
to mi przypomina inny typ ogloszen....
ale juz nic nie mowie :P
From: "BEATRIS" <betty77[]tlen.pl> Subject: Re: pisac konspekty czy nie??? Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:42:57 +0100
W czerwcu ukonczyła staz oraz przykro mówić musialam pisac do kazdej przeprowadzonej
lekcji konspekt. Konspekty musialy zawierac cele, metody oraz sam przebieg
lekcji w miare szczegolowo. Konspekty oddawalam w piatek na caly nastepny
tydzien do przeczytania oraz zatwierdzenia pani dyrektor.
przykro mówić ta sprawa nie jest nigdzie uregulowana oraz wszystko zalezy od
dyrektora.
Na zakonczenie stazu musialam wybrac z takich napisanych oraz parę ciekawszych
lekcji oraz dolozyc do teczki.
Zycze powodzenia oraz wytrwalosci w walce z biurokracja
Pozdrawiam
Bea From: "Dunia" <dunia77de[]netscape.net> Subject: Re: doktorat?? Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 17:03:32 +0200
>Witam.
>Mam jedno bardzo ważne dla mnie pytanie, właśnie otrzymałem propozycję (na
>razie wstępną)rozpoczęcia od przyszłego roku studiów doktoranckich. Niby
>wszystko fajnie tylko problem w tym, że dyrekcja mojego instytutu (UJ) waha
>się czy dać mi stypendium.
[ciach]
Dwa lata temu zapropnowano mi stypendium w instytucie, gdzie studiowalam. O ile
wiem - dostaja wszyscy, ale to jest maly instytut, rzadka specjalnosc, malo
doktorantow (max. 2-3 na roku). Wtedy bylo to jakies 650 zl na pierwszym roku,
docelowo 850 zl na czwartym (z mozliwoscia przedluzenie na kolejny rok).
Dla mnie to bylo za malo - studia doktoranckie na moim kierunku sa zbyt
pracochlonne na etat, nie mialam juz ochoty kolejny rok meczyc sie z
korepetycjami, a juz na pewno nadal mieszkac z rodzicami.
Wyjechalam na studia doktoranckie do Niemiec i przynajmniej zyje jak czlowiek.
Jesli studia doktoranckie za granica wchodza w gre - rozwaz to.
Jesli nie, musisz zastanowic sie, czy jestes w stanie zyc bez stypendium, tzn.
czy masz szanse na jakas dodatkowa prace, pomoc rodzicow etc.
Prestiz prestizem - ale z tego ciezko wyzyc, chyba ze w gre wchodzi malzenstwo
z milonerem (milionerka) ;)
Mysle, ze kluczowym pytaniem jest tutaj: co po doktoracie ? Bo oczywiscie mozna
przechowac sie pare lat na uczelni i uniknac bezrobocia, ale czy potem (bedac w
okolicach trzydziestki) bedzie latwiej znalezc prace... Nie wiem, jak jest
naprawde, ale slyszalam o niecheci pracodawcow do zatrudniania 'doktorkow'...